Planet Igalia WebKit

July 09, 2018

Frédéric Wang

Review of Igalia's Web Platform activities (H1 2018)

This is the semiyearly report to let people know a bit more about Igalia’s activities around the Web Platform, focusing on the activity of the first semester of year 2018.



Igalia has proposed and developed the specification for BigInt, enabling math on arbitrary-sized integers in JavaScript. Igalia has been developing implementations in SpiderMonkey and JSC, where core patches have landed. Chrome and Node.js shipped implementations of BigInt, and the proposal is at Stage 3 in TC39.

Igalia is also continuing to develop several features for JavaScript classes, including class fields. We developed a prototype implementation of class fields in JSC. We have maintained Stage 3 in TC39 for our specification of class features, including static variants.

We also participated to WebAssembly (now at First Public Working Draft) and internationalization features for new features such as Intl.RelativeTimeFormat (currently at Stage 3).

Finally, we have written more tests for JS language features, performed maintenance and optimization and participated to other spec discussions at TC39. Among performance optimizations, we have contributed a significant optimization to Promise performance to V8.


Igalia has continued the standardization effort at the W3C. We are pleased to announce that the following milestones have been reached:

A new charter for the ARIA WG as well as drafts for ARIA 1.2 and Core Accessibility API Mappings 1.2 are in preparation and are expected to be published this summer.

On the development side, we implemented new ARIA features and fixed several bugs in WebKit and Gecko. We have refined platform-specific tools that are needed to automate accessibility Web Platform Tests (examine the accessibility tree, obtain information about accessible objects, listen for accessibility events, etc) and hope we will be able to integrate them in Web Platform Tests. Finally we continued maintenance of the Orca screen reader, in particular fixing some accessibility-event-flood issues in Caja and Nautilus that had significant impact on Orca users.

Web Platform Predictability

Thanks to support from Bloomberg, we were able to improve interoperability for various Editing/Selection use cases. For example when using backspace to delete text content just after a table (W3C issue) or deleting a list item inside a content cell.

We were also pleased to continue our collaboration with the AMP project. They provide us a list of bugs and enhancement requests (mostly for the WebKit iOS port) with concrete use cases and repro cases. We check the status and plans in WebKit, do debugging/analysis and of course actually submit patches to address the issues. That’s not always easy (e.g. when it is touching proprietary code or requires to find some specific reviewers) but at least we make discussions move forward. The topics are very diverse, it can be about MessageChannel API, CSSOM View, CSS transitions, CSS animations, iOS frame scrolling custom elements or navigating special links and many others.

In general, our projects are always a good opportunity to write new Web Platform Tests import them in WebKit/Chromium/Mozilla or improve the testing infrastructure. We have been able to work on tests for several specifications we work on.


Thanks to support from Bloomberg we’ve been pursuing our activities around CSS:

We also got more involved in the CSS Working Group, in particular participating to the face-to-face meeting in Berlin and will attend TPAC’s meeting in October.


We have also continued improving the web platform implementation of some Linux ports of WebKit (namely GTK and WPE). A lot of this work was possible thanks to the financial support of Metrological.

Other activities

Preparation of Web Engines Hackfest 2018

Igalia has been organizing and hosting the Web Engines Hackfest since 2009, a three days event where Web Platform developers can meet, discuss and work together. We are still working on the list of invited, sponsors and talks but you can already save the date: It will happen from 1st to 3rd of October in A Coruña!

New Igalians

This semester, new developers have joined Igalia to pursue the Web platform effort:

  • Rob Buis, a Dutch developer currently living in Germany. He is a well-known member of the Chromium community and is currently helping on the web platform implementation in WebKit.

  • Qiuyi Zhang (Joyee), based in China is a prominent member of the Node.js community who is now also assisting our compilers team on V8 developments.

  • Dominik Infuer, an Austrian specialist in compilers and programming language implementation who is currently helping on our JSC effort.

Coding Experience Programs

Two students have started a coding experience program some weeks ago:

  • Oriol Brufau, a recent graduate in math from Spain who has been an active collaborator of the CSS Working Group and a contributor to the Mozilla project. He is working on the CSS Logical Properties and Values specification, implementing it in Chromium implementation.

  • Darshan Kadu, a computer science student from India, who contributed to GIMP and Blender. He is working on Web Platform Tests with focus on WebKit’s infrastructure and the GTK & WPE ports in particular.

Additionally, Caio Lima is continuing his coding experience in Igalia and is among other things working on implementing BigInt in JSC.


Thank you for reading this blog post and we look forward to more work on the web platform this semester!

July 09, 2018 10:00 PM

June 04, 2018

Michael Catanzaro

Security vulnerability in Epiphany Technology Preview

If you use Epiphany Technology Preview, please update immediately and ensure you have revision 3.29.2-26 or newer. We discovered and resolved a vulnerability that allowed websites to access internal Epiphany features and thereby exfiltrate passwords from the password manager. We apologize for this oversight.

The unstable Epiphany 3.29.2 release is the only affected release. Epiphany 3.29.1 is not affected. Stable releases, including Epiphany 3.28, are also not affected.

There is no reason to believe that the issue was discovered or exploited by any attackers, but you might wish to change your passwords if you are concerned.

by Michael Catanzaro at June 04, 2018 11:00 PM

May 27, 2018

Michael Catanzaro

Thoughts on Flatpak after four months of Epiphany Technology Preview

It’s been four months since I announced Epiphany Technology Preview — which I’ve been using as my main browser ever since — and five months since I announced the availability of a stable channel via Flatpak. For the most part, it’s been a good experience. Having the latest upstream development code for everything is wonderful and makes testing very easy. Any user can painlessly download and install either the latest stable version or the bleeding-edge development version on any Linux system, regardless of host dependencies, either via a couple clicks in GNOME Software or one command in the terminal. GNOME Software keeps it updated, so I always have a recent version. Thanks to this, I’m often noticing problems shortly after they’re introduced, rather than six months later, as was so often the case for me in the past. Plus, other developers can no longer complain that there’s a problem with my local environment when I report a bug they can’t reproduce, because Epiphany Technology Preview is a canonical distribution environment, a ground truth of sorts.

There have been some rough patches where Epiphany Technology Preview was not working properly — sometimes for several days — due to various breaking changes, and the long time required to get a successful SDK build when it’s failing. For example, multimedia playback was broken for all of last week, due to changes in how the runtime is built. H.264 video is still broken, since the relevant Flatpak extension is only compatible with the 3.28 runtime, not with master. Opening files was broken for a while due to what turned out to be a bug in mutter that was causing the OpenURI portal to crash. I just today found another bug where closing a portal while visiting Slack triggered a gnome-shell crash. For the most part, these sorts of problems are expected by testers of unstable nightly software, though I’m concerned about the portal bugs because these affect stable users too. Anyway, these are just bugs, and all software has bugs: they get fixed, nothing special.

So my impression of Flatpak is still largely positive. Flatpak does not magically make our software work properly in all host environments, but it hugely reduces the number of things that can go wrong on the host system. In recent years, I’ve seen users badly break Epiphany in various ways, e.g. by installing custom mimeinfo or replacing the network backend. With Flatpak, either of these would require an incredible amount of dedicated effort. Without a doubt, Flatpak distribution is more robust to user error. Another advantage is that we get the latest versions of OS dependencies, like GStreamer, libsoup, and glib-networking, so we can avoid the many bugs in these components that have been fixed in the years since our users’ LTS distros froze the package versions. I appreciate the desire of LTS distros to provide stability for users, but at the same time, I’m not impressed when users report issues with the browser that we fixed two years ago in one dependency or another. Flatpak is an excellent compromise solution to this problem: the LTS distro retains an LTS core, but specific applications can use newer dependencies from the Flatpak runtime.

But there is one huge downside to using Flatpak: we lose crash reports. It’s at best very difficult — and often totally impossible — to investigate crashes when using Flatpak, and that’s frankly more important than any of the gains I mention above. For example, today Epiphany Technology Preview is crashing pretty much constantly. It’s surely a bug in WebKit, but that’s all I can figure out. The way to get a backtrace from a crashing app in flatpak is to use coredumpctl to manually dump the core dump to disk, then launch a bash shell in the flatpak environment and manually load it up in gdb. The process is manual, old-fashioned, primitive, and too frustrating for me by a lot, so I wrote a little pyexpect script to automate this process for Epiphany, thinking I could eventually generalize it into a tool that would be useful for other developers. It’s a horrible hack, but it worked pretty well the day I tested it. I haven’t seen it work since. Debuginfo seems to be constantly broken, so I only see a bunch of ???s in my backtraces, and how are we supposed to figure out how to debug that? So I have no way to debug or fix the WebKit bug, because I can’t get a backtrace. The broken, inconsistent, or otherwise-unreliable debuginfo is probably just some bug that will be fixed eventually (and which I half suspect may be related to our recent freedesktop SDK upgrade. Update: Alex has debugged the debuginfo problem and it looks like that’s on track to be solved), but even once it is, we’re back to square one: it’s still too much effort to get the backtrace, relative to developing on the host system, and that’s a hard problem to solve. It requires tools that do not exist, and for which we have no plans to create, or even any idea of how to create them.

This isn’t working. I need to be able to effortlessly get a backtrace out of my application, with no or little more effort than running coredumpctl gdb as I would without Flatpak in the way. Every time I see Epiphany or WebKit crash, knowing I can do nothing to debug or investigate, I’m very sorely tempted to switch back to using Fedora’s Epiphany, or good old JHBuild. (I can’t promote BuildStream here, because BuildStream has the same problem.)

So the developer experience is just not good, but set that aside: the main benefits of Flatpak are for users, not developers, after all. Now, what if users run into a crash, how can they report the bug? Crash reports are next to useless without a backtrace, and wise developers refuse to look at crash reports until a quality backtrace has been posted. So first we need to fix the developer experience to work properly, but even then, it’s not enough: we need an automatic crash reporter, along the lines of ABRT or apport, to make reporting crashes realistically-achievable for users, as it already is for distro-packaged apps. But this is a much harder problem to solve. Such a tool will require integration with coredumpctl, and I have not the faintest clue how we could go about making coredumpctl support container environments. Yet without this, we’re asking application developers to give up their most valuable data — crash reports — in order to use Flatpak.

Eventually, if we don’t solve crash reporting, Epiphany’s experiment with Flatpak will have to come to an end, because that’s more important to me than the (admittedly-tremendous) benefits of Flatpak. I’m still hopeful that the ingenuity of the Flatpak community will find some solutions. We’ll see how this goes.

by Michael Catanzaro at May 27, 2018 11:39 PM

April 15, 2018

Manuel Rego

CSSWG F2F Berlin 2018

Last week I was in Berlin for the CSS Working Group (CSSWG) face-to-face meeting representing Igalia, member of the CSSWG since last year. Igalia has been working on the open web platform for many years, where we help our customers with the implementation of different standards on the open source web engines. Inside the CSSWG we play the implementors role, providing valuable feedback around the specifications we’re working on.

It was really nice to meet all the folks from the CSSWG there, it’s amazing to be together with such a brilliant group of people in the same room. And it’s lovely to see how easy is to talk with any of them, you all rock!

CSSWG F2F Berlin 2018 by Rossen Atanassov CSSWG F2F Berlin 2018 by Rossen Atanassov

This is a brief post about my highlights from there, of course totally subjective and focused on the topics I’m more interested.

CSS Grid Layout

We were discussing two issues of the current specification related to the track sizing algorithm and its behavior in particular cases. Some changes will be added in the specification to try to improve them and we’ll need to update the implementations accordingly.

On top of that, we discussed about the Level 2 of the spec. It’s already defined that this next level will include the following features:

  • The awaited subgrids feature: There was the possibility of allowing subgrids in both axis (dual-axis) or only in one of them (per-axis), note that the per-axis approach covers the dual-axis if you define the subgrid in both axis.

    There are clear uses cases for the per-axis approach but the main doubt was about how hard it’d be to implement. Mats Palmgren from Mozilla posted a comment on the issue explaining that he has just created a prototype for the feature following the per-axis idea, so the CSSWG resolved to remove the dual-axis one from the spec.

  • And aspect-ratio controlled gutters: Regarding this topic, the CSSWG decided to add a new ar unit. We didn’t discuss anything more but we need to decide what we’ll do in the situations where there’s no enough free space to fulfill the requested aspect-ratio, should we ignore it or overflow in that case?

    Talking to Rachel Andrew about the issue, she was not completely sure of what would be the preferred option from the authors point of view. I’ve just added some examples to the issue so we can discuss about them there and gather more feedback, please share your thoughts.


This was a discussion I wanted to have with the CSSWG people in order to understand better the current situation and possible next steps for the CSSWG test suites.

Just to add some context, the CSSWG test suites are now part of the web-platform-tests (WPT) repository. This repository is being used by most browser vendors to share tests, including tests for new CSS features. For example, at Igalia we’re currently using WPT test suites in all our developments.

The CSSWG uses the CSS Test Harness tool which has a build system that adds some special requirements for the test suites. One of them causes that we need to duplicate some files in the repository, which is not nice at all.

Several people in the CSSWG still rely on this tool mainly for two things:

  • Run manual tests and store their results: Some CSS features like media queries or scrolling are hard to automate when writing tests, so several specs have manual tests. Probably WebDriver can help to automate this kind of tests, maybe not all though.
  • Extract status reports: To verify that a spec fulfills the CR exit criteria, the current tooling has some nice reports, it also provides info about the test coverage of the spec.

So we cannot get rid of the CSS Test Harness system at this point. We discussed about possible solutions but none of them were really clear, also note that the lack of funding for this kind of work makes it harder to move things forward.

I still believe the way to go would be to improve the WPT Dashboard ( so it can support the 2 features listed above. If that’s the case maybe the specific CSS Test Harness stuff won’t be needed anymore, thus the weird requirements for people working on the test suites will be gone, and there would be a single tool for all the tests from the different working groups.

As a side note needs some infrastructure improvements, for example Microfost was not happy as Ahem font (which is used a lot in CSS tests suites) is still not installed on the Windows virtual machines that extract test results for

Floats, floats, floats

People are using floats to simulate CSS Shapes on browsers that don’t have support yet. That is causing that some special cases related to floats happen more frecuently, and it’s hard to decide what’s the best thing to do on them.

The CSSWG was discussing what would be the best solution when the non-floated content doesn’t fit in the space left by the floated elements. The problem is quite complex to explain, but imagine the following picture where you have several floated elements.

An example of float layout An example of float layout

In this example there are a few floated elements restricting the area where the content can be painted, if the browser needs to find the place to add a BFC (like a table) it needs to decide where to place it avoiding overlapping any other floats.

There was a long discussion, and it seems the best choice would be that the browser tests all the options and if there’s no overlapping then puts the table there (basically Option 1 in the linked illustration). Still there are concerns about performance, so there’s still more work to be done here. As a result of this discussion a new CSS Floats specification will be created to describe the expected behavior in this kind of scenarios.

Monica Dinculescu created a really cool demo to explain how float layout works, with the help of Ian Kilpatrick who knows it pretty well as he has been dealing with lots of corner cases while working in LayoutNG.


The members of the CSSWG were invited to the co-located TYPO Labs event. I attended on Friday when Elika (fantasai), Myles and Rossen gave a talk. It was nice to see that CSS Grid Layout was mentioned in the first talk of the day, as an useful tool for typographers. Variable fonts and Virtual Reality were clearly hot topics in several talks.

Elika (fantasai), Myles and Rossen in the CSSWG talk at TYPO Labs Elika (fantasai), Rossen and Myles in the CSSWG talk at TYPO Labs

It’s funny that the last time I was in Berlin was 10 years ago for a conference related to TYPO3, totally unrelated but with a similar name. 😄


Some pictures of Berlin Some pictures of Berlin

And that’s mostly all that I can remember now, I’m sure I’m missing many other important things. It was a fantastic week and I even find some time for walking around Berlin as the weather was really pleasant.

April 15, 2018 10:00 PM

April 03, 2018

Manuel Rego

Getting rid of "grid-" prefix on CSS Grid Layout gutter properties

Early this year I was working on unprefixing the CSS Grid Layout gutter properties. The properties were originally named grid-column-gap and grid-row-gap, together with the grid-gap shorthand. The CSS Working Group (CSSWG) decided to remove the grid- prefix from these properties last summer, so they could be extended to be used in other layout models like Flexbox.

I was not planning to write a blog post about this, but the task ended up becoming something more than just renaming the properties, so this post describes what it took to implement this. Also people got quite excited about the possibility of animating grid gutters when I announced that this was ready on Twitter.

The task

So the theory seems pretty simply, we currently have 3 properties with the grid- prefix and we want to remove it:

  • grid-column-gap becomes column-gap,
  • grid-row-gap becomes row-gap and
  • grid-gap becomes gap.

But column-gap is already an existent property, defined by the Multicolumn spec, which has been around for a long time. So we cannot just create a new property, but we have to make it work also for Grid Layout, and be sure that the syntax is equivalent.

Animatable properties

When I started to test Multicol column-gap I realized it was animatable, however our implementations (Blink and WebKit) of the Grid Layout gutter properties were not. We’d need to make our properties animatable if we want to remove the prefixes.

More on that, I found a bug on Multicol column-gap animation, as its default computed value is normal, and it shouldn’t be possible to animate it. This was fixed quickly by Morten Stenshorne from Google.

Making the properties animatable is not complex at all, both Blink and WebKit have everything ready to make this task easy for properties like the gutter ones that represent lengths. So I decided to do this as part of the unprefixing patch, instead of something separated.

CSS Grid Layout gutters animation example (check it live)


But there was something else, the Grid gutter properties accept percentage values, however column-gap hadn’t that support yet. So I added percentage support to column-gap for multicolumn, as a preliminary patch for the unprefixing one.

There has been long discussions in the CSSWG about how to resolve percentages on gutter properties. The spec has recently changed so these properties should be resolved to zero for content-based containers. However my patch is not implementing that, as we don’t believe there’s an easy way to support something like that in most of the web engines, and Blink and WebKit are not exceptions. Our patch follows what Microsoft Edge does in these cases, and resolves the percentage gaps like it does for percentage widths or heights. And the Firefox implementation that has just landed this week does the same.

CSS Multi-column percentage column-gap example (check it live)

I guess we’ll still have some extra discussions about this topic in the CSSWG, but percentages themselves deserve their own blog post.


Once all the previous problems got solved, I landed the patches related to unprefixing the gutter properties in both Blink and WebKit. So you can use the unprefixed version since Chrome 66.0.3341.0 and Safari Technology Preview 50.

<div style="display: grid; grid: 100px 50px / 300px 200px;
            column-gap: 25px; row-gap: 10px;">
  <div>Item 1</div>
  <div>Item 2</div>
  <div>Item 3</div>
  <div>Item 4</div>

A simple Grid Layout example using the unprefixed gutter properties A simple Grid Layout example using the unprefixed gutter properties

Note that as specified in the spec, the previous prefixed properties are still valid and will be kept as an alias to avoid breaking existent content.

Also it’s important to notice that now the gap shorthand applies to Multicol containers too, as it sets the value of column-gap longhand (together with row-gap which would be ignored by Multicol).

<div style="column-count: 2; gap: 100px;">
  <div>First column</div>
  <div>Second column</div>

Multicolumn example using gap property Multicolumn example using gap property

Web Platform Tests

As usual in our last developments, we have been using web-platform-tests repository for all the tests related to this work. As a result of this work we have now 16 new tests that verify the support of these properties, including tests for animations stuff too.

Running those tests on the different browsers, I realized there was an inconsistency between css-align and css-multicol specifications. Both specs define the column-gap property, but the computed value was different. I raised a CSSWG issue that has been recently solved, so that the computed value for column-gap: normal should still be normal. This causes that the property won’t be animatable from normal to other values as explained before.

This is the summary of the status of these tests in the main browser engines:

  • Blink and WebKit: They pass all the tests and follow last CSSWG resolution.
  • Edge: Unprefixed properties are available since version 41. Percentage support is interoperable with Blink and WebKit. The computed value of column-gap: normal is not normal there, so this needs to get updated.
  • Firefox: It doesn’t have support for the unprefixed properties yet, however the default computed value is normal like in Blink and WebKit. But Multicol column-gap percentage support has just been added. Note that there are already patches on review for this issue, so hopefully they’ll be merged in the coming days.


The task is completed and everything should be settled down at this point, you can start using these unprefixed properties, and it seems that Firefox will join the rest of browser by adding this support very soon.

Igalia and Bloomberg working together to build a better web Igalia and Bloomberg working together to build a better web

Last, but not least, this is again part of the ongoing collaboration between Igalia and Bloomberg. I don’t mind to repeat myself over and over, but it’s really worth to highlight the support from Bloomberg in the CSS Grid Layout development, they have been showing to the world that an external company can directly influence in the new specifications from the standard bodies and implementations by the browser vendors. Thank you very much!

Finally and just as a heads-up, I’ll be in Berlin next week for the CSSWG F2F meeting. I’m sure we’ll have interesting conversations about CSS Grid Layout and many other topics there.

April 03, 2018 10:00 PM

March 18, 2018

Philippe Normand

Web Engines Hackfest 2014

Last week I attended the Web Engines Hackfest. The event was sponsored by Igalia (also hosting the event), Adobe and Collabora.

As usual I spent most of the time working on the WebKitGTK+ GStreamer backend and Sebastian Dröge kindly joined and helped out quite a bit, make sure to read …

by Philippe Normand at March 18, 2018 09:18 AM